Based on the table structure given in the image, to return the value 'CUBE' from the 'bricks' table when joined with 'boxes', the condition must ensure that the weight of the bricks is within the allowed weight range specified in the 'boxes' table for a 'SMALL' box size.
A. True. Since MAX_WEIGHT is 0, a comparison using >= min_weight AND weight < max_weight will only return rows where the weight is less than 0, which is impossible for actual weight values, suggesting there might be a mistake in the data provided or the comparison logic.
E. True. NOT (weight > max_weight) effectively translates to 'where weight is less than or equal to max_weight'. However, since MAX_WEIGHT is 0, this condition would only be true if the weight is not greater than 0, which can only happen if the weight is 0 or less. This seems to indicate an anomaly where either the data is incorrect, or the condition is meant to handle a case where the weight is zero or possibly a negative placeholder value.
Both B and D will potentially return more than just 'CUBE' if there are bricks with weights greater than MIN_WEIGHT. C is incorrect because BETWEEN is inclusive, and there are no weights that are both greater than or equal to MIN_WEIGHT and less than or equal to MAX_WEIGHT when MAX_WEIGHT is 0.
