An engineer is implementing clustering in Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center.

The intended control node should be assigned a numerically lower priority value than the other cluster nodes. Cisco Secure Firewall cluster priority values operate inversely: the lowest numerical value represents the highest election priority. For example, a node configured with priority 1 takes precedence over nodes configured with priorities 10 or 20. If the current control node fails, the available node with the highest priority—meaning the lowest configured number—is elected as the replacement. Values 0 and 255 are outside the documented 1–100 range for this Management Center clustering implementation. Therefore, the node with greater processing resources should receive a lower numerical value. The supplied answer of C in List B is incorrect and has been corrected to B based on Cisco documentation. Cisco Secure Firewall clustering documentation

================