During a workplace-violence investigation at a logistics company in Memphis, Tennessee, security staff seized a...

The correct answer is A because the device is believed to store recorded footage from the loading bay, which places the evidence source in the video-recording category rather than general mobile or computer categories. CHFI v11 includes multimedia basics and evidence-source awareness, and ISO/IEC-aligned handling expects investigators to classify the device according to the kind of digital evidence it most directly contains. A compact recording device used to retain surveillance footage is most consistent with digital still and video camera style evidence, including CCTV-related material. The mobile-device option would be more appropriate if the question focused on a phone, tablet, or wearable used mainly for communications or app data. Standard computers and network categories do not fit the physical evidence source described. In forensic practice, the classification matters because imaging, access, storage media handling, and metadata expectations can differ depending on whether the examiner is dealing with video-recording equipment or another device class. Since the scenario centers on a compact device storing recorded footage from a surveillance area, the best-fitting category is digital still and video cameras including CCTV.