Which design consideration is valid when you contrast FabricPath and TRILL?

Both FabricPath and TRILL are Layer 2 multipath technologies designed to eliminate spanning tree and allow for efficient forwarding across Layer 2 fabrics using routing techniques:

B (FabricPath permits active-active FHRP and TRILL supports anycast gateway):FabricPath (Cisco proprietary) integrates with vPC+ to allow active-active First Hop Redundancy Protocol (FHRP) operation at the access layer. This enables multiple default gateways to operate simultaneously, improving resiliency and utilization.TRILL (IEEE standard) uses anycast gateway functionality natively, where multiple switches share the same IP and MAC address for default gateway, allowing hosts to forward to any available gateway, providing active-active behavior at Layer 3.

Other options explained:

A: Incorrect — both FabricPath and TRILL are based on IS-IS for control plane operations; VXLAN is not part of TRILL.

C: Incorrect — both FabricPath and TRILL support ECMP (Equal Cost Multi-Path) to utilize multiple paths efficiently.

D: Incorrect — both technologies allow active-active forwarding at Layer 2.

This comparison highlights CCDE v3.1 design expertise in data center fabric architectures and control plane technologies.