Which dimensions are suitable for analyzing individual stakeholders of a cloud implementation in a 2x2...

A 2x2 matrix in SAP OCM stakeholder analysis plots individuals for strategic engagement. Option B is correct—attitude (negative vs. positive) gauges support level—e.g., a positive VP vs. a negative clerk—guiding communication focus. Option C is correct as influence (low vs. high) measures impact potential—e.g., a high-influence director can sway outcomes more than a low-influence user—prioritizing effort. Together, they create a matrix (e.g., high-influence/positive = “champions”) for tailored strategies.

Option A is incorrect—“degree of resistance” overlaps with attitude; it’s a symptom, not a distinct axis. Option D is incorrect; change impact extent is group-level (e.g., unit-wide), not individual-specific in a 2x2. SAP OCM uses attitude/influence for precision.

“Analyze stakeholders in a 2x2 matrix using attitude (positive/negative) and influence (low/high) toprioritize engagement effectively” (SAP Activate, Stakeholder Analysis Tools).