A Design Change Request (DCR) is a formal proposal to modify project specifications. While enhancements can improve design outcomes, each DCR must be evaluated for its impact on quality, cost, and schedule before approval.
The best approach is to evaluate DCRs systematically (Option C) by:
Assessing compliance with project requirements, quality standards, and codes.
Identifying quality risks and ensuring the proposed changes maintain structural integrity.
Conducting impact analysis on cost, schedule, and constructability.
Coordinating with relevant stakeholders (owners, engineers, and contractors) to verify feasibility.
Option A (Approving all DCRs based on team preference): Can lead to scope creep, delays, and budget overruns.
Option B (Rejecting DCRs outright): Ignores potential improvements that could enhance project quality and efficiency.
Option D (Allowing the design team alone to decide): Lacks multidisciplinary review and can overlook broader project constraints.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:According to DOE G 413.3-1 and ISO 9001:2015, systematic evaluation of DCRs is essential for maintaining quality and project success.
ISO 9001:2015, Clause 8.3.6 – Management of design changes to ensure compliance and quality.
DOE O 413.3B – Requires evaluation of change requests to ensure project integrity.
ANSI/ASQ Z1.9 – Statistical principles for assessing design modifications in construction.
ASQ Construction Quality Management (CQM) ReferencesThus, the best answer is C: Evaluate the DCRs to ensure quality checks are identified.
