Which of the following is an example of a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium...

Reduced code coverage at the unit and integration test levels is a potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation projects. Code coverage is the measure of how much of the application has been tested. Low code coverage can be a sign of missed test cases, which can lead to instability and security vulnerabilities. Additionally, when code coverage is low, it becomes more difficult to detect bugs, which can lead to a slower release process.

One potential negative outcome associated with Selenium test automation project is reduced code coverage at the unit and integration test levels. Selenium tests are typically higher-level tests that focus on the user interface and end-to-end functionality of the system. While these tests can provide valuable coverage of the system, they may not cover all aspects of the code. Unit tests and integration tests, on the other hand, provide more fine-grained coverage of the code and can help identify defects early in the development process. If an organization relies too heavily on Selenium tests and neglects other types of testing, they may miss important defects in the code.