The traditional Fat AP networking usually applies to WLANs of small and micro stores.

In a WAC + Fit AP architecture, the WAC (Wireless Access Controller) centrally manages and controls the Fit APs, so option A is correct. Service configurations such as SSIDs, security policies, radio parameters, and access control are generally delivered from the WAC to the APs. The Fit AP mainly forwards wireless user traffic and executes the configuration issued by the controller.

Option D is also correct because a Fit AP provides 802.11 wireless access for stations (STAs) and serves as a bridge between the wireless side and the wired network. This is one of its basic roles in enterprise WLAN deployment. Option B is incorrect because users or administrators do not normally need to log in to each Fit AP individually to configure wireless services; centralized management by the WAC is the whole advantage of this architecture. Option C is incorrect because CAPWAP communication between the WAC and AP does not require Layer 2 adjacency ; the WAC and AP can communicate over Layer 3 as long as IP connectivity exists. HCIA-Datacom emphasizes centralized configuration, simplified operations, and scalable deployment as key benefits of WAC + Fit AP networking.

============