In addition to a route reflector, the confederation is another method that reduces the number...

A is correct – Confederations are specifically designed for large-scale BGP deployments where a full IBGP mesh is impractical.

B is correct – Sub-ASs within a confederation establish EBGP-like connections between each other but behave like IBGP within the overall AS. These sub-ASs do not require full-mesh inside the confederation , but EBGP rules are followed between sub-ASs.

C is false – Not all devices need to be reconfigured . Devices within the same sub-AS retain normal IBGP behavior and minimal changes.

D is correct – Confederation is transparent to external peers , so the logical topology remains the same from outside the AS.

Reference from Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Core Technology Study Guide:

“BGP confederation divides an AS into multiple sub-ASs. EBGP-like sessions are established between sub-ASs, while reducing IBGP mesh complexity. The external AS still sees the AS as one unit.”

(Chapter: BGP Scalability Enhancements – Section: Confederation)