Which challenge is best addressed through coaching rather than therapy?

The ICF defines coaching as a process focused on "partnering with clients in a thought-provoking and creative process that inspires them to maximize their personal and professional potential" (ICF Definition of Coaching). Coaching operates within specific boundaries, emphasizing future-oriented, goal-directed support rather than addressing mental health conditions or deep psychological issues, which fall under therapy (ICF Coaching Boundaries). Let’s analyze each option:

A. Inability to concentrate or complete tasks at work over several months: This suggests a persistent cognitive or emotional issue, potentially linked to conditions like ADHD or depression, which require therapeutic intervention beyond coaching’s scope (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 2.5: "I will refer clients to other professionals when appropriate").

B. Recurring thoughts of self-harm over the past two weeks: This is a serious mental health concern requiring immediate therapeutic or psychiatric support, not coaching (ICF Coaching Boundaries explicitly exclude mental health treatment).

C. Feelings of anxiety or panic surrounding work-related tasks: While coaching can address performance-related stress, ongoing anxiety or panic suggests a clinical issue better suited for therapy (ICF Code of Ethics, Section 2.5).

D. Struggling to get promoted despite working at a company for five years: This is a professional development challenge focused on goals, skills, or strategies—ideal for coaching. It aligns with ICF Competency 8 ("Facilitates Client Growth") by supporting the client in identifying barriers and creating action plans to achieve career aspirations.

Thus, option D is best addressed through coaching, as it fits within ICF’s ethical scope and competency framework for enhancing potential without crossing into therapeutic territory.