Risk analysis involves assessing both the impact and likelihood of risks, and these should be assessed together. This combined assessment helps in understanding the full scope of potential risks and is crucial for effective risk management and prioritization.
IIA guidance and risk management frameworks like COSO and ISO 31000.QUESTION NO: 459
According to IIA guidance, which of the following statements is true with regard to the chief audit executive's (CAE's) responsibility for conducting a self-assessment of the internal audit activity?
1 The CAE should select an independent reviewer or review team to perform sufficient tests of the self-assessment to validate the results
2 The CAE should validate results by engaging experienced audit professionals from a separate internal audit activity outside of the organization to reperform all of the tests conducted for the assessment
3. The CAE should select independent, nonaudit professionals who are knowledgeable about the organization and the industry in which it operates to assist with performing the self-assessment
4. The CAE may consider performing a self-assessment with independent external validation in Iieu of performing a full external assessment
A. 1 and 2 only.
B. 1 and 4 only
C. 1, 2, and 3
D. 3 and 4
Answer: B
According to IIA guidance, the chief audit executive (CAE) may consider performing a self-assessment with independent external validation in lieu of performing a full external assessment. This is known as a self-assessment with independent validation (SAIV) and is acceptable as a part of the internal audit activity’s quality assurance and improvement program. Choosing an independent reviewer or review team to perform sufficient tests of the self-assessment to validate the results is also aligned with IIA standards for maintaining quality within the internal audit function.References: IIA Standard 1300: Quality Assurance and Improvement Program, which outlines requirements for ongoing and periodic reviews of the internal audit activity.
