You are auditing a manufacturer of specialty tea products during a Stage 2 certification audit.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Clause 9.1.1 – Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation (General) requires the organization to:

“Determine what needs to be monitored and measured, the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation needed to ensure valid results, and when results shall be analyzed and evaluated.”

The goal is to ensure valid, reliable, and consistent measurement of process and product performance. Here's how each correct option supports compliance:

✅ B. Analysis of the results of sensory tests

This directly aligns with the requirement for analysis and evaluation of monitoring results. Clause 9.1.3 also supports the use of such data for evaluating product conformity and process effectiveness.

✅ G. Sensory testing results are recorded

This supports documented evidence of monitoring results, as required under 9.1.1(e), to verify that quality checks (such as flavor and aroma assessments) are being done consistently.

✅ H. The Hedonic Method is used to monitor the quality of the product

Use of a standardized measurement method like the Hedonic Scale aligns with 9.1.1(b), which requires defined methods to ensure valid and reproducible results.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect or Less Relevant:

A. University degrees → Related to competence (Clause 7.2), not monitoring and measurement (Clause 9.1.1).

C. Independent expert review → Not part of regular monitoring unless it’s built into the process.

D. Respiratory testing → Irrelevant to product quality monitoring.

E. Outsourcing → Would shift responsibility but doesn’t demonstrate internal conformance.

F. Safe disposal → Pertains to Clause 8.5.4 (Preservation), not Clause 9.1.1.