Referring to the exhibit, which two statements about IPv6 routing are correct?

The provided exhibit displays the output of the show route table inet6.0 command, which represents the master routing table for IPv6 unicast traffic in Junos OS. Analysis of the specific route entries reveals that all listed destinations are categorized as either [Direct/0] or [Local/0] . These route types indicate that the table only contains networks physically connected to the router ' s interfaces and the specific IP addresses assigned to those interfaces.

Because there are no routes identified by dynamic protocols (such as OSPFv3, IS-IS, or BGP) or static entries, it is verified that the router is not learning IPv6 routes from any neighbors or peers. Consequently, the routing table lacks reachability information for any non-local or remote IPv6 segments. Without these routes or a configured default gateway (::/0), the router is unable to forward traffic to remote IPv6 networks. Statements C and D are factually incorrect based on the exhibit: the 2001:db8:22:108::/64 network is associated with interface ge-0/0/4.0 (not ge-0/0/5.0), and the 2001:db8:22:107::/64 network is entirely absent from the displayed routing table.