In mortgage loan origination, a key focus is ensuring the borrower has the financial means to cover the costs of the mortgage, including closing costs, down payments, and reserves. Fraud may be indicated when there are discrepancies or inconsistencies in the borrower's disclosed assets and income. Here’s a detailed explanation of why Option A is the correct answer:
Bank Deposits that are not supported by income or other disclosures (Option A):
This is a red flag for possible fraud. If large or frequent deposits are reflected in the borrower’s bank accounts but cannot be linked to their income or other sources of funds disclosed in the application (e.g., salary, bonuses, or documented gifts), it raises suspicions that the borrower may be trying to misrepresent their financial position.
The Uniform Residential Loan Application (URLA) or 1003 form requires borrowers to disclose their assets, liabilities, and income sources in detail. Mortgage underwriters will carefully review these disclosures and cross-check them with bank statements to verify the legitimacy of deposits.
According to Fannie Mae’s Selling Guide, large, unexplained deposits need to be sourced and seasoned (i.e., must be in the borrower’s account for a specific period, typically two months) to ensure the funds are legitimate. Unsupported deposits that cannot be explained could indicate that the funds are coming from non-disclosed sources, such as unreported loans, which could impact the borrower’s ability to repay the loan.
Disclosure of gift funds (Option B):
Disclosing gift funds is a legitimate and common source of funds for closing costs and down payments, especially for first-time homebuyers. As long as the gift funds are properly documented (typically via a gift letter from the donor), this would not raise concerns of fraud. Lenders typically require that the gift funds come from a verifiable source, and a gift letter confirming that the funds are a true gift, not a loan that must be repaid, is crucial.
Parental loans disclosed but not yet received (Option C):
If a borrower discloses a loan from a parent but has not yet received the funds, this may raise underwriting concerns about whether the borrower truly has sufficient assets for closing. However, this does not indicate fraud as long as the loan is disclosed. The lender would verify that the loan will be received and accounted for prior to closing. The loan could potentially affect the borrower’s debt-to-income ratio (DTI) but wouldn’t necessarily suggest deception.
Borrower's receipt of a large bonus from an employer (Option D):
Receiving a large bonus from an employer is not in itself suspicious as long as the bonus is documented and can be verified by the lender. Borrowers often use bonuses as part of their qualifying income, and these are acceptable as long as they are stable and likely to continue, as outlined in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines. Therefore, this would not indicate fraud unless there was an attempt to misrepresent the amount or source of the bonus.
In conclusion, Option A (Bank deposits that are not supported by income or other disclosures) is the most likely indicator of potential fraud because it involves unexplained and unverified funds, which may suggest misrepresentation of the borrower's financial standing.
