Which of these are possible solutions to bridge two networks over a wireless link:

To bridge two networks over a wireless link (i.e., perform Layer 2 bridging), MikroTik offers several wireless modes that support bridging:

WDS (Wireless Distribution System) is MikroTik’s mechanism to forward Layer 2 frames over wireless

pseudobridge and pseudobridge-clone attempt to mimic Layer 2 bridging, with some limitations

Option analysis:

A.✔Correct–Using AP mode on both ends and enabling WDS allows full Layer 2 bridging

B.✔Correct–pseudobridge-clone allows limited bridging by spoofing the MAC address of the connected host

C.✔Correct–station-pseudobridge enables partial bridging (one client per MAC)

D.✘Incorrect–station mode alone does not support Layer 2 bridging; it performs routing/NAT instead

Extract from MTCNA Course Material – Bridging and Wireless Section:

"To bridge over wireless, you can use WDS or station-pseudobridge(-clone). WDS provides true Layer 2 bridging, while pseudobridge methods simulate it for single hosts."

Extract from René Meneses Study Guide – Wireless Bridging:

“WDS is most reliable for bridging. pseudobridge and pseudobridge-clone work with one client and should be used cautiously.”

Extract from Terry Combs Notes – Wireless Bridging:

“station mode alone is not sufficient for bridging. Use WDS or pseudobridge options.”

===========