A network engineer receives a new router to use for WAN connectivity.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased, aligned to N10-009):

In a spine–leaf architecture, endpoints (including servers, firewalls, and WAN/edge routers) connect to leaf switches. Leaf switches then uplink to spine switches; spine switches do not have endpoints connected directly to them. Therefore, a WAN router (an external/edge device) should connect to the leaf layer—often specifically to a “border leaf” that handles external connectivity.

Why not B. Core or D. Spine? In spine–leaf, “core” isn’t a formal layer, and spines are designed only to interconnect leafs, not to terminate endpoints.

Why not A. Access? “Access” is a term from the traditional three-tier model (access–distribution–core). In modern spine–leaf language, the analogous layer for endpoint attachment is the leaf.

References (CompTIA Network+ N10-009):

Domain: Network Infrastructure — Data center and campus architectures (spine–leaf vs. three-tier), roles of leaf/spine, WAN/edge connectivity points.

===========