Which of the following VPN configurations forces a remote user to access internet resources through...

A full-tunnel VPN forces a remote user’s traffic—including access to public internet resources—to traverse the corporate VPN tunnel and egress from the organization’s network. This is commonly required to ensure consistent enforcement of corporate security controls such as web filtering, IDS/IPS inspection, DLP policies, logging, and access control. In Network+ terms, full-tunnel VPNing routes the user’s default gateway through the VPN, meaning both internal traffic (to corporate subnets) and external traffic (to internet destinations) is sent through the encrypted tunnel.

By contrast, a split-tunnel VPN (not listed) would send only corporate-bound traffic through the VPN while allowing internet traffic to go directly out the user’s local ISP—reducing corporate bandwidth usage but also reducing centralized inspection and control. Clientless VPN usually refers to browser-based access to specific internal applications without a full network tunnel for all traffic. Site-to-site VPN connects entire networks to each other (e.g., branch office to HQ) rather than an individual remote user. SSE (Security Service Edge) is a cloud security framework/service model, not the classic VPN configuration described in the question. Hence, full-tunnel is the correct answer.