A solutions architect needs to host a high performance computing (HPC) workload in the AWS...

Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Question Answer

A solutions architect needs to host a high performance computing (HPC) workload in the AWS Cloud. The workload will run on hundreds of Amazon EC2 instances and will require parallel access to a shared file system to enable distributed processing of large datasets. Datasets will be accessed across multiple instances simultaneously. The workload requires access latency within 1 ms. After processing has completed, engineers will need access to the dataset for manual postprocessing.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Use Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) as a shared fie system. Access the dataset from Amazon EFS.

Mount an Amazon S3 bucket to serve as the shared file system. Perform postprocessing directly from the S3 bucket.

Use Amazon FSx for Lustre as a shared file system. Link the file system to an Amazon S3 bucket for postprocessing.

Configure AWS Resource Access Manager to share an Amazon S3 bucket so that it can be mounted to all instances for processing and postprocessing.

Explanation:

Amazon FSx for Lustre is the ideal solution for high-performance computing (HPC) workloads that require parallel access to a shared file system with low latency. FSx for Lustre is designed specifically to meet the needs of such workloads, offering sub-millisecond latencies, which makes it well-suited for the 1 ms latency requirement mentioned in the question.

Here is why FSx for Lustre is the best fit:

Parallel File System: FSx for Lustre is a parallel file system that can scale across hundreds of Amazon EC2 instances, providing high throughput and low-latency access to data. It is optimized for processing large datasets in parallel, which is essential for HPC workloads.

Low Latency: FSx for Lustre is capable of providing access latencies well within 1 ms, making it ideal for performance-sensitive workloads like HPC.

Seamless Integration with Amazon S3: FSx for Lustre can be linked to an Amazon S3 bucket. This integration allows data to be imported from S3 into FSx for Lustre before the workload begins and exported back to S3 after processing. This feature is crucial for manual postprocessing because it enables engineers to access the dataset in S3 after processing.

Performance: FSx for Lustre is built for workloads that require high performance, such as machine learning, analytics, media processing, and financial simulations, which are typical for HPC environments.

In contrast:

Amazon EFS (Option A): While EFS provides shared file storage and scales across multiple EC2 instances, it does not offer the same level of performance or sub-millisecond latencies as FSx for Lustre. EFS is more suited for general-purpose workloads, not high-performance computing.

Mounting S3 as a file system (Option B and D): S3 is object storage, not a file system designed for low-latency access and parallel processing. Mounting S3 buckets directly or using AWS Resource Access Manager to share the bucket would not meet the low-latency (1 ms) or performance requirements needed for HPC workloads.

Therefore, Amazon FSx for Lustre (Option C) is the most appropriate and verified solution for this scenario.

AWS References:

Amazon FSx for Lustre

Best Practices for High Performance Computing (HPC)

Amazon FSx and Amazon S3 Integration

Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 View All Questions