Which of the following is an effective way to determine the priority of an incident?

Understanding the number of people affected provides important evidence about an incident's business impact and therefore helps determine appropriate priority.

Incident prioritisation should follow agreed criteria rather than convenience or personal status. A widespread service failure affecting an entire department, site, or customer population normally represents greater business impact than an equivalent failure affecting one user, although other business-critical factors must also be considered.

The workload of the resolver group does not determine the inherent priority of the incident. Resource constraints may affect escalation or workload management, but they should not redefine business impact. Similarly, priority should not automatically increase merely because a particular individual reported the incident unless organisational policy and business-impact criteria legitimately justify it. Whether something might be resolved before lunchtime is clearly not a valid prioritisation criterion. SDA v9 requires analysts to understand Incident Management, effective service support, SLAs, and appropriate escalation. Therefore, of the options presented, assessing how many people are affected is the relevant impact-based approach.