When executing test cases during the User Acceptance Testing phase of Automation Implementation and an...

During the User Acceptance Testing (UAT) phase, unforeseen scenarios are not uncommon. The Business Analyst (BA) plays a crucial role in ensuring that these scenarios are managed effectively to maintain the integrity and functionality of the automation.

Understand the Role of UAT:

UAT is designed to ensure that the developed automation aligns with the agreed-upon business requirements​​.

It involves validating both happy path and exception scenarios. Any new scenario not documented in the UAT plan needs to be addressed systematically​​.

Why Option B is Correct:

Logging the scenario as a deviation ensures transparency and accountability.

Collaborating with the implementation team allows the BA to leverage their technical expertise for a resolution​​.

This approach ensures that the scenario is evaluated, documented, and potentially included in future testing cycles.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A: Handling the situation independently disregards team collaboration, potentially leading to gaps in understanding or misaligned fixes​​.

Option C: Escalating the issue to the project manager without involving the development team delays resolution and bypasses the experts directly responsible for the automation​​.

Option D: Ignoring the scenario undermines the purpose of UAT, risking the deployment of incomplete or non-functional automation​​.

References to UiPath Practices:

The PDD and UAT plans emphasize logging deviations and continuously updating documentation during UAT​​.

Change management principles highlight the importance of documenting new requirements and involving the relevant teams​​.

By logging and addressing deviations collaboratively, the BA ensures the automation solution is robust, efficient, and aligned with business needs.