Refer to the following scenario to answer the question below.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 250 words of Explanation From Workday Record-to-Report/Course Guide/topics:

The posted journals and opened periods establish the current ledger year's sequencing population, so the newly added condition cannot be introduced into that year's existing sequence generators. The earliest controlled implementation is the next ledger year, provided no journals have posted there and the company removes the unused future ID generators before activating the updated journal sequence rule.

Closing the remaining current-year periods does not retroactively rebuild generators that already assigned numbers. The condition cannot be inserted before year-end while current-year posted journals remain, because that could compromise sequential or gapless numbering. Option D is also incorrect because the condition can be used prospectively when the eligibility requirements are met. Before the next year begins, the administrator should keep its periods out of Open status, verify that no journals have posted, delete only the unused generated IDs, activate the revised rule, and recreate or assign the new generators. Once posting begins under the new year, the same restrictions apply. Therefore, option B accurately identifies both the earliest period and the required controls for adopting the new condition.

Official Workday reference: Workday - Configure Journal Sequence Generator Rules ; topics: future-year journal sequence changes and unused ID generators.

===============