During the Foundations phase for Project Increment 4, Sukra Aroon held a meeting with Hira,...

The correct answer is A .

In AgilePM, the business case does not depend on having a fully fixed and detailed scope from the start. Instead, it is based on:

the business need ,

expected benefits ,

viability,

and confidence that sufficient value can be delivered within agreed constraints.

Why A is correct:

It correctly explains that AgilePM focuses on goals and benefits , not exhaustive detail upfront.

It also correctly brings in MoSCoW prioritization , which helps ensure that the most important value is delivered first within fixed time and cost.

This allows flexibility in lower-priority scope while maintaining investment control.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B introduces incremental funding in a way that is not the core explanation here.

C describes a predictive, fixed-scope model rather than AgilePM.

D is too vague and does not directly explain how a business case can exist without detailed delivery certainty.

So the best answer is A .