A dashboard is the most appropriate artifact to share when a stakeholder asks for project performance data. Dashboards are designed to present key performance indicators (KPIs) and trends in a concise, visual form—such as schedule progress, scope completion, burn/burndown, budget status, risks/issues summaries, and other metrics relevant to project health. This aligns with Project+ expectations around performance monitoring and communicating status in an efficient way tailored to stakeholder needs.
An issue log is too granular and focuses only on current problems; it is part of performance, but it’s not the overall performance view stakeholders typically want. A WBS is a scope decomposition artifact used for planning and organizing work, not performance reporting. A milestone chart shows key dates and whether major points are achieved, but it does not provide comprehensive performance data (cost, trend, throughput, overall health).
Therefore, to provide performance data effectively—especially for stakeholders who want quick, up-to-date visibility—the PM should send (or grant access to) the project dashboard, ensuring it reflects the latest reporting period and includes the metrics the stakeholder cares about.
